Generic AI writes about anything.
I write SEO articles about your business.
Most AI churns out interchangeable filler that could belong to any site. I don't. Every article I write is grounded in your own pages, aimed at searches people actually run, in your brand's voice and your chosen author — then checked for Content Readiness against its exact search job before it can go live.
Research, write, finish.
I ground it in what's true about you.
I pick a topic from real search demand, then pull the most relevant pages from your own site to write from. Where your pages back a claim I cite them; for a topic your site hasn't covered yet, I write from broad industry knowledge and flag the draft that way — so you always know which is which.
I draft it in your voice.
I write in your brand's voice and as your chosen author — a real person in first person, or your brand as 'we'. Then I fact-check it myself, researching before I cut a claim, never just guessing.
I add the images, links, and snippet.
Before you see a draft I weave in internal links to pages I've confirmed exist, write the search snippet — the title and description people see in Google — reusing the tags your site already uses, and, where they help, plan and place a cover and any inline figures.
Bulk tools write filler. I write your article.
Hand a generic generator a keyword and it returns something that could sit on any website on earth — plausible, polished, and about nothing in particular. That's the opposite of what ranks and the opposite of what I do.
Every article I write starts from your own pages: I retrieve the most relevant ones from your business knowledge base and write from them, citing them where they back a claim and writing from broad industry knowledge where they don't — I won't pretend your site says something it doesn't. The topic comes from real search demand, not a random daily idea, and the words come out in your voice and your author's. Before any draft reaches you, I check it reads on-brand, stays specific to your business, actually covers the topic, and holds up to a fact-check I research before I cut a claim — anything that can't clear the bar is held for your review, never quietly published. It's one of the moves in the autonomous engine, alongside the work to refresh decaying pages and internal linking, and the same engine powers everything else Ghost Writr does. Once you approve, it publishes straight to WordPress, or through the content feed your site already pulls from — and you can read each one as it lands on the blog.
Four things in every draft.
Every article carries these four — so it reads like your business wrote it, not a template.
- 01 Grounded in your knowledge I write from your own crawled pages and cite them — or flag broad industry knowledge where your site hasn't covered it.
- 02 Aimed at real search demand Topics come from Search Console impressions and live search-volume data — not a random daily idea.
- 03 Written in your voice Your brand voice and chosen author — a real person in first person, or your brand as 'we'.
- 04 Its own on-brand images Where they help, I plan, generate and quality-check a cover and any inline figures, then place them in the article.
AI article writing, answered.
Where the words come from, whether it sounds like you, and what keeps quality up.
- How is this different from generic AI article writers?
- Generic tools take a keyword and return something that could live on any website. I write from your business — I retrieve your own crawled pages, cite them where they back a claim, and aim each article at search demand I can actually measure. The result reads like your business, not a template.
- Is every article based on my site's content?
- Where your pages cover the topic, yes — I retrieve and cite them. For genuinely new topics your site hasn't covered, I write from broad industry knowledge and flag the draft that way honestly, rather than pretending your site says something it doesn't. You always know which is which.
- Does it actually sound like us?
- I learn your brand voice from your site and write as the author you choose — their name, role and bio shape how it reads. A real author writes in the first person; a brand persona writes as 'we'. Brand and reader fit are part of Content Readiness, so an off-voice attempt is revised instead of being treated as a finished outcome.
- How do you pick what to write about?
- From real demand, not guesses — Google Search Console impressions plus live search-volume and what's already ranking, trusting your own Search Console signals most. Each topic becomes the article's goal, so I'm writing toward something searchers actually look for.
- What stops it from publishing something bad?
- Every article gets a frozen search job and a deterministic Content Readiness target. I verify the exact final package — body, metadata, links and media — against that job, its required coverage, your brand and every claim that needs a source. Autopilot can publish only a current package that is Ready; a failed attempt stays internal while the engine tries the next useful outcome.
- Does it write the images, links and SEO bits too?
- Yes — all in the same pass. I weave in internal links to pages I've confirmed exist, write the search snippet — the title and description searchers read in Google — reusing the tags your site already uses, and, where they help, plan and place a cover plus any inline figures, checking each one looks right before it goes in.
Hire the content team
that never sleeps.
Ghost Writr ships an action a day, every day. Approve with a reply, watch the graph compound.